Search for: All records

Despite being a quintessential example of a hard problem, the quest for finding fast algorithms for deciding satisfiability of propositional formulas has occupied computer scientists both in theory and in practice. In this article, we survey recent progress on designing algorithms with strong refutation guarantees forsmoothedinstances of the $k$-SAT problem. Smoothed instances are formed by slight random perturbations of arbitrary instances, and their study is a way to bridge the gap between worst-case and average-case models of problem instances. Our methods yield new algorithms for smoothed $k$-SAT instances with guarantees that match those for the significantly simpler and well-studied model ofrandomformulas. Additionally, they have led to a novel and unexpected line of attack on some longstanding extremal combinatorial problems in graph theory and coding theory. As an example, we will discuss the resolution of a 2008 conjecture of Feige on the existence of short cycles in hypergraphs. 

The Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) is the analog of the PCP theorem in the world of parameterized complexity. It asserts that no FPT algorithm can distinguish a satisfiable 2CSP instance from one which is only (1-ε)-satisfiable (where the parameter is the number of variables) for some constant 0 < ε < 1. We consider a minimization version of CSPs (Min-CSP), where one may assign r values to each variable, and the goal is to ensure that every constraint is satisfied by some choice among the r × r pairs of values assigned to its variables (call such a CSP instance r-list-satisfiable). We prove the following strong parameterized inapproximability for Min CSP: For every r ≥ 1, it is W[1]-hard to tell if a 2CSP instance is satisfiable or is not even r-list-satisfiable. We refer to this statement as "Baby PIH", following the recently proved Baby PCP Theorem (Barto and Kozik, 2021). Our proof adapts the combinatorial arguments underlying the Baby PCP theorem, overcoming some basic obstacles that arise in the parameterized setting. Furthermore, our reduction runs in time polynomially bounded in both the number of variables and the alphabet size, and thus implies the Baby PCP theorem as well. 

We study the problem of robust multivariate polynomial regression: let p: ℝⁿ → ℝ be an unknown n-variate polynomial of degree at most d in each variable. We are given as input a set of random samples (𝐱_i,y_i) ∈ [-1,1]ⁿ × ℝ that are noisy versions of (𝐱_i,p(𝐱_i)). More precisely, each 𝐱_i is sampled independently from some distribution χ on [-1,1]ⁿ, and for each i independently, y_i is arbitrary (i.e., an outlier) with probability at most ρ < 1/2, and otherwise satisfies |y_i-p(𝐱_i)| ≤ σ. The goal is to output a polynomial p̂, of degree at most d in each variable, within an 𝓁_∞-distance of at most O(σ) from p. Kane, Karmalkar, and Price [FOCS'17] solved this problem for n = 1. We generalize their results to the n-variate setting, showing an algorithm that achieves a sample complexity of O_n(dⁿlog d), where the hidden constant depends on n, if χ is the n-dimensional Chebyshev distribution. The sample complexity is O_n(d^{2n}log d), if the samples are drawn from the uniform distribution instead. The approximation error is guaranteed to be at most O(σ), and the run-time depends on log(1/σ). In the setting where each 𝐱_i and y_i are known up to N bits of precision, the run-time’s dependence on N is linear. We also show that our sample complexities are optimal in terms of dⁿ. Furthermore, we show that it is possible to have the run-time be independent of 1/σ, at the cost of a higher sample complexity.